Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-04-01 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3532 HB 412 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 412 An Act making appropriations for the operating and loan program expenses of state government, for certain programs, and to capitalize funds; making appropriations under art. IX, sec. 17(c), Constitution of the State of Alaska, from the constitutional budget reserve fund; and providing for an effective date. with the: Journal Page FIN RPT CS(FIN) 8DP 3AM 3472 The Speaker invoked Section 102 of Masons Manual. Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 412(FIN) (same title) Representative Navarre objected. The question being: Shall the House adopt CSHB 412(FIN)? The roll was taken with the following result: HB 412 Second Reading Adopt Finance CS YEAS: 26 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Nays: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3533 HB 412 And so, CSHB 412(FIN) was adopted. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Brice: Page 4, line 11, through page 5, line 8: Delete all material and insert: "* Sec. 9. COMPENSATION INCREASES. (a) The sum of $14,970,300 is appropriated from the general fund and other funds as set out in this subsection to Office of the Governor, office of management and budget, for allocation among the appropriate state departments and agencies to fund, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1997, the monetary terms of collective bargaining agreements with the bargaining units set out in (b)(1) of this section and to fund the increase in salaries of state employees listed in (b)(2) of this section: FUND SOURCE APPROPRIATION AMOUNT General fund $8,164,200 General fund match 341,600 General fund - program receipts 524,500 Federal receipts 1,429,400 Inter-agency receipts 638,500 Education trust 100 University of Alaska/dormitory/food/auxiliary service 800 Federal incentive payments 24,500 Benefits systems receipts 17,100 Agricultural loan fund 10,400 State corporation receipts 230,600 FICA administration fund account 700 Fish and game fund 180,500 Science and technology endowment fund 11,100 Highway working capital fund 178,500 International airports revenue fund 368,700 Public employees retirement fund 18,700 Second injury fund 1,900 Disabled fishermans reserve account 1,900 Surplus property revolving fund 2,400 Teachers' retirement system fund 17,200 Veterans' revolving loan fund 1,600 Commercial fishing loan fund 15,100 University of Alaska/student tuition/fees/services 26,900 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3534 HB 412 Real estate surety fund 900 Judicial retirement system 400 P.L. 81-874 1,100 National guard retirement system 300 University receipts 5,400 Training and building fund 8,100 Permanent fund dividend fund 39,500 Rural development initiative fund 900 Oil/hazardous prevention and response fund 89,500 Investment loss trust fund 100 Inter-agency receipts/oil and hazardous waste 14,100 Capital improvement project receipts 1,009,100 Power project loan fund 4,400 Public school fund 600 Mining revolving loan fund 100 Fisheries enhancement revolving loan fund 1,600 Alternative energy revolving loan fund 2,000 Residential energy revolving loan fund 100 Bulk fuel revolving loan fund 600 Alaska clean water loan fund 2,300 Marine highway system fund 1,436,500 Gifts/grants 1,200 Storage tank assistance fund 11,800 Information services fund 132,800 (b) The amount appropriated by (a) of this section shall be allocated to the appropriate state departments and agencies to fund, as appropriate, (1) the collective bargaining agreements with (A) Alaska State Employees Association, for the General Government Unit; (B) Alaska Public Employees Association, for the Supervisory Unit; (C) Public Employees Local 71, for the Labor, Trades and Crafts Unit; (D) Inlandboatmen's Union of the Pacific, representing the unlicensed marine unit; (E) International Organization of Masters, Mates, and Pilots, Pacific Maritime Region, for the Masters, Mates, and Pilots Unit; 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3535 HB 412 (F) Public Safety Employees Association, representing state troopers and other commissioned law enforcement personnel; (G) the Classified Employees Association, representing University of Alaska employees; and (H) the Alaska Community Colleges' Federation of Teachers, representing faculty members of the University of Alaska; and (2) the increase in salaries of (A) state employees of the executive branch who are denominated exempt employees; (B) state employees who are denominated excluded personnel; (C) University of Alaska nonunion classified and professional employees; (D) University of Alaska nonunion faculty employees." Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Hanley objected. Representative Robinson placed a call of the House and lifted the call. Representative B.Davis declared a conflict of interest. Representative Mackie placed a call of the House and lifted the call. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Long, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3536 HB 412 Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Absent: Kubina And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Long: Page 13, line 15: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 4,633,200 Insert 5,271,700 Under General Fund: Delete 4,522,500 Insert 5,131,000 Representative Long moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Kohring objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3537 HB 412 And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that the House recess until 7:30 p.m. There being no objection, the House recessed at 6:04 p.m. HB 412 Representative Brown placed a call of the House and lifted the call. The following members moved and asked unanimous consent that they be allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest: Representative Willis Representative James Objection was heard, and the members were required to vote. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative B.Davis: Page 18, line 36: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 8,815,900 Insert 9,270,400 Under General Fund: Delete 1,502,600 Insert 1,832,100" Under Other Funds: Delete 7,313,300 Insert 7,438,300 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3538 HB 412 Page 19, following line 7: Insert Federal Student Aid Under Allocations: Insert 454,500 Representative Robinson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Kohring objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: B.Davis And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Amendment No. 4 was offered by Representative Elton: Page 14, line 12: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 12,100,100 Insert 12,959,500 Under General Fund: Delete 7,100,100 Insert 7,959,500 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3539 HB 412 Representative Elton moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 4 be adopted. Representative Kelly objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 4 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: B.Davis Absent: Barnes, Bunde, Ivan, Masek And so, Amendment No. 4 was not adopted. Amendment No. 5 was offered by Representative Brice: Page 35, line 29: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 19,326,100 Insert 18,376,100 Under General Fund: Delete 19,191,900 Insert 18,241,900 Page 35, line 30: Under Allocations: Delete 3,729,300 Insert 2,779,300 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3540 HB 412 Page 22, line 3: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 197,296,500 Insert 198,246,500 Under General Fund: Delete 99,075,100 Insert 100,025,100 Page 22, line 9: Under Allocations: Delete 44,008,200 Insert 44,958,200 Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 5 be adopted. Objection was heard. Representative Kubina moved and asked unanimous consent that the question be divided. The Speaker ruled the question was divisible. There being no objection, Amendment No. 5 was divided. Part A of Amendment No. 5: Page 35, line 29: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 19,326,100 Insert 18,376,100 Under General Fund: Delete 19,191,900 Insert 18,241,900 Page 35, line 30: Under Allocations: Delete 3,729,300 Insert 2,779,300 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3541 HB 412 The question being: Shall Amendment No. 5, Part A be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 5, Part A YEAS: 3 NAYS: 32 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 4 Yeas: Brice, Elton, Grussendorf Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Brown, Bunde, Davies, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Masek, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Robinson, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis Excused: B.Davis Absent: Finkelstein, Kelly, Martin, Moses And so, Amendment No. 5, Part A was not adopted. Part B of Amendment No. 5: Page 22, line 3: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 197,296,500 Insert 198,246,500 Under General Fund: Delete 99,075,100 Insert 100,025,100 Page 22, line 9: Under Allocations: Delete 44,008,200 Insert 44,958,200 The question being: Shall Amendment No. 5, Part B be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3542 HB 412 CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 5, Part B YEAS: 13 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: B.Davis Absent: Moses And so, Amendment No. 5, Part B was not adopted. Amendment No. 6 was offered by Representative Nicholia: Page 21, line 5: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 2,751,100 Insert 2,901,100 Under General Fund: Delete 1,144,400 Insert 1,294,400 Page 21, line 6: Under Allocations: Delete 1,401,900 Insert 1,551,900 Representative Nicholia moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 6 be adopted. Representative Masek objected. 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3543 HB 412 The question being: Shall Amendment No. 6 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 6 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: B.Davis Absent: Ogan And so, Amendment No. 6 was not adopted. Amendment No. 7 was offered by Representative B.Davis: Page 17, line 38: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 951,300 Insert 1,442,600 Under General Fund: Delete 442,300 Insert 752,300 Under Other Funds: Delete 509,000 Insert 690,300 Page 18, line 5: Under Allocations: Delete 763,000 Insert 1,254,300 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3544 HB 412 Representative Robinson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 7 be adopted. Representative Kohring objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 7 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 7 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: B.Davis Absent: Moses And so, Amendment No. 7 was not adopted. Amendment No. 8 was offered by Representative Brice: Page 35, line 35: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 5,068,100 Insert 3,816,100 Under General Fund: Delete 5,068,100 Insert 3,816,100 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3545 HB 412 Page 22, line 27: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 39,777,700 Insert 42,281,700 Under General Fund: Delete 19,492,100 Insert 20,744,100 Under Other Funds: Delete 20,285,600 Insert 21,537,600 Page 22, line 33: Under Allocations: Delete 5,828,500 Insert 8,332,500 Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 8 be adopted. Representative Hanley objected. Representative Kubina moved and asked unanimous consent that the question be divided. The Speaker ruled the question was divisible. There being no objection, Amendment No. 8 was divided. Part A of Amendment No. 8: Page 35, line 35: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 5,068,100 Insert 3,816,100 Under General Fund: Delete 5,068,100 Insert 3,816,100 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3546 HB 412 The question being: Shall Amendment No. 8, Part A be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 8, Part A YEAS: 6 NAYS: 30 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Elton, Finkelstein, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Davies, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: B.Davis Absent: James, Martin, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 8, Part A was not adopted. Part B of Amendment No. 8: Page 22, line 27: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 39,777,700 Insert 42,281,700 Under General Fund: Delete 19,492,100 Insert 20,744,100 Under Other Funds: Delete 20,285,600 Insert 21,537,600 Page 22, line 33: Allocations: Delete 5,828,500 Insert 8,332,500 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3547 HB 412 The question being: Shall Amendment No. 8, Part B be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 8, Part B YEAS: 13 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: B.Davis Absent: James, Martin, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 8, Part B was not adopted. Amendment No. 9 was offered by Representative Brice: Page 35, line 35: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 5,068,100 Insert 3,963,100 Under General Fund: Delete 5,068,100 Insert 3,963,100 Page 22, line 27: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 39,777,700 Insert 41,987,700 Under General Fund: Delete 19,492,100 Insert 20,597,100 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3548 HB 412 Under Other Funds: Delete 20,285,600 Insert 21,390,600 Page 22, line 34: Under Allocations: Delete 6,788,600 Insert 8,998,600 Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 9 be adopted. Representative Hanley objected. Representative Kubina moved and asked unanimous consent that the question be divided. The Speaker ruled that the question was divisible. There being no objection, Amendment No. 9 was divided. Part A of Amendment No. 9: Page 35, line 35: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 5,068,100 Insert 3,963,100 Under General Fund: Delete 5,068,100 Insert 3,963,100 The question being: Shall Amendment No. 9, Part A be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 9, Part A YEAS: 5 NAYS: 33 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3549 HB 412 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Elton, Finkelstein, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Davies, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Robinson, Rokeberg, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: B.Davis Absent: Sanders And so, Amendment No. 9, Part A was not adopted. Part B of Amendment No. 9: Page 22, line 27: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 39,777,700 Insert 41,987,700 Under General Fund: Delete 19,492,100 Insert 20,597,100 Under Other Funds: Delete 20,285,600 Insert 21,390,600 Page 22, line 34: Under Allocations: Delete 6,788,600 Insert 8,998,600 The question being: Shall Amendment No. 9, Part B be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3550 HB 412 CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 9, Part B YEAS: 13 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: B.Davis Absent: Sanders And so, Amendment No. 9, Part B was not adopted.